Beyond peer review. Audit the reasoning. Know what's safe to build on.
SyncLogic audits research papers so you can separate robust, reproducible science from weak or overstated claims—and make decisions with confidence.
Transform any research paper into an audited, evidence-based assessment with a clear level of reliance and a defined permission-to-rely.
Defines the claim and research questions precisely
Finds, evaluates and registers the right evidence
Tests alternatives, assumptions and method choices
Finds the weakest link that limits reliability
Assigns a Reliance Class (RC 0–7) and states what is justified
Issues a Permission-to-Rely verdict for the intended use
The same disciplined method, applied to this claim type: define, decompose, register evidence, test admissibility, explore alternatives, find the weakest link, assign reliance, and issue a verdict.
Rewrite the paper's main claims and research questions precisely. Lock the scope, population, intervention/exposure, comparator and outcomes.
What exactly is being claimed?Break down claims into testable sub-claims: mechanisms, associations, effects, causality, comparisons, generalisations.
What must be true for this claim to hold?Find and register all relevant sources: data, methods, prior studies, protocols, code, datasets. Note what is missing.
What evidence exists and what does it actually support?Evaluate each source for relevance, authority, timeliness, transparency, methodology, independence and jurisdiction.
Is this source fit for the claim and purpose?Assess study design, sampling, randomisation, measurement validity, controls, confounders, statistical methods and power.
Are the methods appropriate and well executed?Identify credible alternative explanations and contradictory findings. Test whether they are addressed or dismissed adequately.
What alternatives were tested or missed?Surface key assumptions, model choices, extrapolations and inferential leaps. Flag optimistic or hidden assumptions.
Which assumptions or inferences are most fragile?Locate the step, assumption or data point that most limits the reliability of this paper's conclusions.
Where could this paper break first?Rate overall reliability, then state what the paper can be used for—and at what level (explore, inform, decide). Note limits and conditions.
How much reliance is justified, and for what?Create a transparent audit record: claims, sources, methods, limitations, findings, RC rating and verdict.
Can others see, test and reproduce this audit?Methods, data and reporting quality vary widely across journals and disciplines.
Results can be influenced by unreported analyses, thresholds and choices.
Advanced statistics and models can obscure assumptions and limitations.
New evidence can overturn or weaken previous conclusions.
Many findings cannot be replicated with the same data and methods.
Scope creep and causal claims are often broader than the evidence supports.
Incomplete access to data, code and methods limits verification.
SyncLogic turns any research paper into a clear, audited assessment you can trust. We show what is supported, what is not, and what level of reliance is justified. Better audits. Better science. Better decisions.
SYNCLOGIC