SYNCLOGIC
Scope
Define the adult population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timeframe and intended decision.
Not just more information — verifiable understanding.
SyncLogic audits the reasoning, evidence and assumptions behind scientific claims so you know what is known, what is uncertain, and what is safe to rely on.
Transform any scientific claim into an audited, evidence-based conclusion with a clear level of reliance.
Breaks complex claims into testable parts
Finds, evaluates and registers the right evidence
Tests competing explanations and mechanisms
Identifies the weakest link in the argument
Assesses how much the claim is safe to rely on
Issues a Permission-to-Rely verdict for the intended use
The same disciplined method, applied to this claim type: define, decompose, register evidence, test admissibility, explore alternatives, find the weakest link, assign reliance, and issue a verdict.
Rewrite the claim precisely. Lock the scope, population, context and time frame.
What exactly is being claimed?Break the claim into explicit sub-claims, assumptions, inferences and dependencies.
What must be true for this claim to hold?Find primary sources, data, studies and reports. Register each source to the specific sub-claim it is intended to support.
What evidence exists and what does it actually support?Evaluate each source using HAT-7: relevance, authority, timeliness, transparency, methodology, limitations, and jurisdiction.
Is this source fit for the claim and purpose?Identify and map credible competing explanations or mechanisms. Test whether they are addressed or ruled out.
Have reasonable alternatives been seriously tested?Check each causal or logical link. Identify assumptions and where they come from.
Which links or assumptions are most fragile?Locate the point that most limits the reliability of the entire claim.
Where could the claim break first?Rate the overall claim based on evidence strength, uncertainty, and dependency depth.
How much reliance is justified?State what the claim can be used for—and at what level (explore, inform, decide, act).
What is this claim safe to be used for, right now?Produce a transparent audit record anyone can inspect, challenge and reproduce.
Can others see, test and reproduce the audit?Many variables, feedbacks, and indirect effects.
Models simplify reality and depend on assumptions and parameters.
Short records, long timescales and natural variability hide true signals.
Sparse data, proxies and measurement uncertainty limit certainty.
Confirmation bias and political narratives can override evidence.
Associations are often mistaken for cause.
Claims drift from specific, evidence-based findings to over-broad conclusions.
SyncLogic audits the reasoning path, not just the destination. So you can see the strength, the limits, and the safe use.
This is an illustrative method example, not a completed client audit or an independently validated finding.
Define the adult population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timeframe and intended decision.
Separate efficacy, effect size, population transferability, safety and practical implementation claims.
Distinguish controlled studies, observational findings, reviews, expert commentary and secondary summaries.
Test regression to the mean, selection effects, measurement changes, co-interventions and publication bias.
The headline effect depends on a subgroup analysis that was not the study’s primary endpoint.
May justify further investigation or expert review; does not yet justify a general causal or practice-changing conclusion.